Sunday, May 15, 2005

Beware the Dark Side

With Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith less than a week away, perhaps the time is right to pose the following question - Is Exopolitics the Dark Side of the Ufological Force?

Yes.

It threatens to corrupt everything that is good within ufology - it undermines the search for the truth; it turns the scientific and historical methods on their heads; it is populated by dark characters of questionable repute, in the form of Whistleblowers (the late William Cooper being perhaps the most notorious, a ufological Darth Maul without the nifty wardrobe; Bob Lazar, Philip Corso, Michael Wolf also qualify - the list goes on and on); it replaces evidence with dark conspiracy theory.

Worst of all, it spreads dissension within the ranks, a veritable fifth column of Ufoligical Sith.



So, you might ask, if Exopolitics is the Ufological Dark Side, is there an Exopolitical Palpatine? Steven Greer pops to mind, but his power is clearly in decline (call him Count Dooku). No, if there is an Exopolitical Palpatine, it surely must be Dr. Michael Salla, who just seems to be hitting his stride.

His Dark-side "methodology" threatens to corrupt ufology, perhaps beyond repair (unlike some, I still hold out hope for the "Old Ufological Republic").

The latest manifestation of this can be found at his website, http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-30.htm, where he talks about how to ask the "right questions in UFO research and Exopolitics" (see how he neatly links UFO research and Exopolitics, implying they are the same thing, when they are not... Beware, young Jedi everywhere).

What kind of questions shouldn't be asked, according to Dr. Salla?

Well, he states that one should never ask an alleged Whistleblower "Where are documents proving your service record or employment history?" He also says one should never question a Whistleblower as to inconsistencies in either documents that outline their service or employment records, or the claims that they are making. Never question the fact that no public records exist verifying educational claims. Never ask why no other independent witnesses have come forward to corroborate the Whistleblowers claims. Never suggest that the Whistleblowers might simply be seeking to make a buck, or may be self-aggrandizing publicity seekers. And so on.

Of course, the questions that Dr. Salla says we should not be asking are precisely the questions that real, objective researchers should (and do) ask.

As Palpatine does in the Star Wars films, Dr. Salla offers people the easy way out. Eschew the old methods, he says, because they don't work, or they don't work quickly enough. Join the Dark Side of research. It's easier. It's faster. It will confirm your pre-existing beliefs. It will lead to the truth.

Like Palpatine and the Dark Side, it's a seductive offer, made to people who are frustrated by the seeming lack of progress in ufological research, and who are frustrated by the in-fighting amongst ufologists.

It's also the wrong path to take.

It won't lead to the truth.

It can only lead to the further marginalization of those who study the UFO phenomenon; it can only lead to a dark Ufolgical Empire of blind belief, bereft of critical thought, logic, and reason.

Beware...

In the interests of preserving the Republic, here's some advice for those young ufological Anakin Skywalkers out there, who might be tempted by the Exopolitical Dark Side.

Take everything the Exopolitics-types tell you, and then do the opposite.

And, a final piece of Ufological Jedi wisdom:

"Patience, young Jedi - Rome wasn't built in a day."

Paul "Obi-Wan" Kimball

6 comments:

RRRGroup said...

The Dark Side has alreasy taken over the "Old Ufological Republic" and is manifested in the likes of John Velez, Alfred Lehmberg, Cathy Reason, Wendy Connors; and Earl Bruce-Knapp is Palpatine.

CJ

Paul Kimball said...

Chris:

EBK as Palpatine?

Nah.

Chancellor Valorum, perhaps.

As for the Jedi, for all their flaws, we still have Hall, Clark, Friedman, Sparks, Randle, Aldrich etc....

Now all we need is Amidala!

Paul

Anonymous said...

I was hoping you'd comment on this, Paul. Salla's latest, the "right questions to ask" article, solidly represents everything that "real" researchers (scientists, historians, etc.) tend to point out when they dismiss "UFOlogy". It's a shambles-- an illogical mess of seeing only what one wants to see and endless, recursive question-begging.

Q- "Why should we believe whistleblowers?"

A- "Because whistleblowers should be believed!"

I teach a course in logic and critical thinking and I plan to use this in class as a perfect example of "how not to think."

I did my MA thesis in history on Cold War UFO belief and I had to work damned hard and be damned careful to NOT think like a UFOlogist, but like an historian. I was proud of my work then. Proud that I was able to get away with writing my thesis on a topic I'd been looking at since childhood. I thought that maybe if I could get away with it, others could too and the subject would get scholarly treatment from those who respected the topic.

Salla's uncritical silliness pisses all over EVERYthing that serious thinkers have added to the field over the years.

I hope this made sense. The beer tends to blur my brain.

RRRGroup said...

Ah, but gentlemen, what you overlook is that Salla is diplomatic, and mannerly.

That's how the Serpent deceived Eve, and it's how the Devil works in the world.

And if the Serpent, and Satan are not Promethean, then we're left with the likes of vulgar men and misanthropes like Lehmberg and Velez who make ufology seem like a snake-pit, while Salla lulls us with nice words and grammatically correct sentences, syntax free of low-life insertions.

No wonder he scares you. Salla may be the great deceiver, but he sure makes the deception a pleasantry.

Don't bother to rebut. Salla may be all wet, but I like his style, and would rather be seduced by a man who is courteous and charming than one who is uncouth and crude.

CJ

Paul Kimball said...

Chris:

You prove my case - your description is bang on, and makes (for those of us familiar with the Star Wars films) Salla the perfect Palpatine.

However...

As for his "grammatically correct" sentences, have you ever actually read one of his papers, or posts on updates? Don't confuse long-windedness for command of the English language.

Paul

Paul Kimball said...

ag:

Makes perfect sense. I couldn't agree more.

I suspect this is the only way that Salla, or his ideas, will ever find their way back into a true academic setting.

Paul